Supreme Court rules bump stock ban unconstitutional.

I'm actually agreeing with Sotamayor in her dissent. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks it's probably a duck. That's as far as my agreement goes though. Under the law it's not a machine gun and the ATF should not be able to restrict something "just because we say so".
There's a big difference between interpreting the law and arbitrarily re-writing it. I have no desire for a bump stock, but that doesn't mean I want yours taken away. I disagree with most everything in the nfa of 1934. (I might've gotten the name and date wrong, but you all know what I'm referring to).