(Yesterday, 03:48 PM)Rampy Wrote: (Yesterday, 03:21 PM)specops56 Wrote: I think I've got it now. You have the Ultra MAGA version of TDS..... Trump Denial Syndrome: Trump can do no wrong. He banned bumpstocks and wants to take your guns and maybe give you due process later based on your ex wife's word but he's still the greatest protector of your gun rights the world has ever known, Right?
Terry
Sure, why not 🤷🤷
like I said, I look at the whole picture & what’s best for America as a country
I’ve said before I was not a Trump fan, but the left pushed me into supporting him and they converted me into a vocal supporter of his and I am a Hugh JD Vance fanboy as well as a Pete Hegseth fanboy & Tulsi Gabbard fanboy
im also a huge fan of who he appointed as VA director
Waiting to see who is appointed to run the FBI/ATF/USSS and a few others
not every appointment will make me drooling happy, but such is life
Oh and I only have 1 cloth item that has anything to do with Trump & it’s a hat from the winery he has nothing to do with politics
I do really like Trump wine, it’s extremely tasty
I freely admit that I like Trump's style and he did do a lot of good things for the country the first time. But when he violates my GOD given rights, that cancels out everything else in my book. I am a single issue voter. My single issue is FREEDOM!
I took an oath before GOD, just as you did, to protect the Constitution. You don't protect the Constitution by putting into power people who openly declare that they want and/or intend to violate it!
Terry
I'm in Rampy's camp here. Is president Trump perfect, no, it's impossible to be perfect for everyone. I'd like to see him be better on 2a but he's a damn site better than the alternative. Overall, he is and has been good for the country. I also agree on JD Vance. He'd make a fine #48!
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 04:35 PM by tommag.)
(Yesterday, 04:29 PM)tommag Wrote: I'm in Rampy's camp here. Is president Trump perfect, no, it's impossible to be perfect for everyone. I'd like to see him be better on 2a but he's a damn site better than the alternative. Overall, he is and has been good for the country. I also agree on JD Vance. He'd make a fine #48!
So, it's okay if a President breaks his oath and violates some of our Constitutional rights as long as we like the other things he does? How does that make us any better than the other side? They don't care if a President infringes our rights as long as he's doing the things that they like. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say "Shall not be infringed unless you like the guy and the other things he's doing."
If we put blinders on and ignore when "our" guy infringes our rights the same ways the other side wants to and has, then we are hypocrites.
Terry
(Yesterday, 05:28 PM)specops56 Wrote: (Yesterday, 04:29 PM)tommag Wrote: I'm in Rampy's camp here. Is president Trump perfect, no, it's impossible to be perfect for everyone. I'd like to see him be better on 2a but he's a damn site better than the alternative. Overall, he is and has been good for the country. I also agree on JD Vance. He'd make a fine #48!
So, it's okay if a President breaks his oath and violates some of our Constitutional rights as long as we like the other things he does? How does that make us any better than the other side? They don't care if a President infringes our rights as long as he's doing the things that they like. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say "Shall not be infringed unless you like the guy and the other things he's doing."
If we put blinders on and ignore when "our" guy infringes our rights the same ways the other side wants to and has, then we are hypocrites.
Terry Of course you don't ignore it, make your voice heard. I'm just saying look at the alternative.
(Yesterday, 05:28 PM)specops56 Wrote: (Yesterday, 04:29 PM)tommag Wrote: I'm in Rampy's camp here. Is president Trump perfect, no, it's impossible to be perfect for everyone. I'd like to see him be better on 2a but he's a damn site better than the alternative. Overall, he is and has been good for the country. I also agree on JD Vance. He'd make a fine #48!
So, it's okay if a President breaks his oath and violates some of our Constitutional rights as long as we like the other things he does? How does that make us any better than the other side? They don't care if a President infringes our rights as long as he's doing the things that they like. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say "Shall not be infringed unless you like the guy and the other things he's doing."
If we put blinders on and ignore when "our" guy infringes our rights the same ways the other side wants to and has, then we are hypocrites.
Terry
Trump is picking his people best he can, don’t like it then let your congressional clowns know who you are against & why
Last I checked you can’t linch someone for having a different opinion & everyone is innocent till proven guilty but the level of the sky is falling towards his AG pick is ridiculous
I don't really have much of an opinion here, but I'm willing to bet that the hoe is significantly more anti gun than Trump will be, especially with Vance as #2.
(Yesterday, 11:20 PM)The Shooters Apprentice Wrote: I don't really have much of an opinion here, but I'm willing to bet that the hoe is significantly more anti gun than Trump will be, especially with Vance as #2.
You don’t have much of an opinion & then you call her a hoe
Mummmm k
(8 hours ago)Rampy Wrote: (Yesterday, 11:20 PM)The Shooters Apprentice Wrote: I don't really have much of an opinion here, but I'm willing to bet that the hoe is significantly more anti gun than Trump will be, especially with Vance as #2.
You don’t have much of an opinion & then you call her a hoe
Mummmm k It sounds like he's referring to Kamala.
(7 hours ago)tommag Wrote: (8 hours ago)Rampy Wrote: (Yesterday, 11:20 PM)The Shooters Apprentice Wrote: I don't really have much of an opinion here, but I'm willing to bet that the hoe is significantly more anti gun than Trump will be, especially with Vance as #2.
You don’t have much of an opinion & then you call her a hoe
Mummmm k It sounds like he's referring to Kamala.
Zing……that went right over my head…..
now I understand & am tracking, time for breakfast coffee/mushroom brain food 🤣
The following 1 user Likes Rampy's post:1 user Likes Rampy's post
(Yesterday, 10:31 PM)Rampy Wrote: (Yesterday, 05:28 PM)specops56 Wrote: (Yesterday, 04:29 PM)tommag Wrote: I'm in Rampy's camp here. Is president Trump perfect, no, it's impossible to be perfect for everyone. I'd like to see him be better on 2a but he's a damn site better than the alternative. Overall, he is and has been good for the country. I also agree on JD Vance. He'd make a fine #48!
So, it's okay if a President breaks his oath and violates some of our Constitutional rights as long as we like the other things he does? How does that make us any better than the other side? They don't care if a President infringes our rights as long as he's doing the things that they like. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say "Shall not be infringed unless you like the guy and the other things he's doing."
If we put blinders on and ignore when "our" guy infringes our rights the same ways the other side wants to and has, then we are hypocrites.
Terry
Trump is picking his people best he can, don’t like it then let your congressional clowns know who you are against & why
Last I checked you can’t linch someone for having a different opinion & everyone is innocent till proven guilty but the level of the sky is falling towards his AG pick is ridiculous
Where did I say anything about "lynching" anybody?
When you pick from the swamp you get the swamp. Trump was an outsider so why didn't he pick from the outside? You really think the best people come from inside the swamp?
Terry
|