Trump on the 2A……

Colion Noir posted his thoughts on Trumps EO

https://youtu.be/ufSDsUHBIoU?si=dWUBtJXivORaIFfl

President Trump has ordered the Attorney General to, within the next 30 days, identify any ongoing Second Amendment infringements in the orders, regulations, and legal positions taken by the Biden Administration, and to propose a plan for rectifying them:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-...nt-rights/

It's a good start.

Terry

A federal judge in Mississippi just dropped a ruling that has the ATF sweating bullets—literally. Judge Carlton Reeves ruled that the federal machine gun ban is unconstitutional, and this case could send shockwaves through the entire gun rights debate.

(📽️: Video Link IN Comments)

What Happened:
Justin Bryce Brown was charged with owning a machine gun under 18 U.S.C. § 922(o)—a law that bans the possession of machine guns made after 1986.

The judge ruled that the government failed to prove that banning machine guns aligns with historical firearm restrictions, a key test under the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision.

The "dangerous and unusual" argument fell apart when the court found that 740,000 legally owned machine guns exist in the U.S. today. If nearly a million people own something, can it really be called "unusual"?

What This Means:
This ruling only applies to this case for now, but if it gets appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, things could get very interesting.

The Fifth Circuit previously upheld the machine gun ban in Hollis v. Lynch (2016), but back then, there were only 175,000 legally owned machine guns. Now, that number is 740,000—a fourfold increase. That could change everything.

If the Fifth Circuit agrees with this ruling, it could put major pressure on the Supreme Court to revisit the federal machine gun ban.

The Big Question:
Are machine guns really "unusual" if nearly a million of them are legally owned? And if they’re not, does the government have the authority to ban them at all?

What do you think? Is this the beginning of the end for the federal machine gun ban? Or is the Fifth Circuit about to drop a massive plot twist? Drop your thoughts in the comments.

(📽️: Video Link IN Comments)

The judge in this case used the number of machine guns in civilian hands which includes law enforcement and private citizens. He is of course correct in using the larger number because "in common use" wasn't intended to count only private citizens but all users. There are 175,000 on the transferable post '86 machine gun list.

As for suppressors not being "arms", the judge wanted to remove them from 2A protection but has likely opened a can of worms that could remove them from ATF control as well.

The judge in this case used the number of machine guns in civilian hands which includes law enforcement and private citizens. He is of course correct in using the larger number because "in common use" wasn't intended to count only private citizens but all users. There are 175,000 on the transferable post '86 machine gun list.

As for suppressors not being "arms", the judge wanted to remove them from 2A protection but has likely opened a can of worms that could remove them from ATF control as well.

The problem with that is, if accessories are no longer 2A protected, then the states can ban any or all of them willly nilly. No more optics, magazines, muzzle brakes, weapon lights, etc. Only the original parts essential to it’s function that came on it from the factory would be protected. Magazines are not essential to the functioning of a firearm. You can load 1 round by hand and the gun will function. This may be the true intention of this ruling.

The true solution is to get the NFA and GCA repealed. It could be done now with the GOP contolling all houses. But, of course, it won’t happen just like repealing Obummercare last time.

Terry

One thing I do like about Trump: I believe he's the only real America First president that we have had, in my lifetime, since JFK. That's why they killed JFK and will try to kill Trump. Again!

Terry