Fifteen months ago this guy was born. Look at him now! He picks up all four feet for trimming, wears a fly mask, bathes, hard ties, ground drives with long reins, loads into a trailer, will back out of trailer, and will soon be a master of crossing wooden bridges.
[FPC News] FPC, FPCAF Statement on SCOTUS ‘Bump Stock’ Decision
<p><strong>WASHINGTON, D.C.</strong><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (June 14, 2024) – Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and FPC Action Foundation (FPCAF) applauded the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Garland v. Cargill</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;">, a case challenging the federal government’s unlawful ban on ‘bump-stock’ devices. The decision can be viewed </span><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-976_e29g.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">here</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Both organizations filed important merits-stage briefs in the case; FPC’s brief is available </span><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-976/299048/20240129134622196_22-976%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">here</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, and FPCAF’s brief is available </span><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-976/299033/20240129123752348_22-976%20-%20FPCAF%20-%20Amicus.pdf"><span style="font-weight: 400;">here</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p>
[FPC News] Update: FPC Moves Closer to Final Decision in New York City Lawsuit Over
<p><strong>NEW YORK, NY</strong><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (June 13, 2024) – Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that it has filed its final </span><a href="https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/6296/attachments/original/1717770984/2024.06.06_049_P's_%28FPC%29_Memo_in_Reply_and_in_Opposition_to_D's_Cross-MSJ.pdf?1717770984"><span style="font-weight: 400;">brief</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> in support of its motion for summary judgment in </span><a href="https://www.firearmspolicy.org/calce"><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Calce v. City of New York</span></em></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, FPC’s lawsuit challenging New York City’s ban on electronic arms like stun guns and tasers. The brief, which also opposed the City’s cross-motion for summary judgment, can be viewed at </span><a href="http://fpclegal.org"><span style="font-weight: 400;">FPCLegal.org</span></a></p>
![[Image: IMG-1561.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/PvqvbBCR/IMG-1561.jpg)
![[Image: IMG-1562.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/LnwgfQ2x/IMG-1562.jpg)
![[Image: IMG-1565.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/23HZj8JR/IMG-1565.jpg)
![[Image: IMG-1570.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/QVN7rWfJ/IMG-1570.jpg)
![[Image: IMG-1572.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/JGGBsCVy/IMG-1572.jpg)
![[Image: imagejpeg.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/kRvRjv4h/imagejpeg.jpg)
![[Image: IMG-0304.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/RWL64RLS/IMG-0304.jpg)
