+- AlphaRomeo15 (https://www.alpharomeo15.org)
+-- Forum: Back at the Hooch (https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Forum-Back-at-the-Hooch)
+--- Forum: Off Topic (https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Forum-Off-Topic)
+--- Thread: Interesting question. (/Thread-Interesting-question)
Interesting question. - specops56 - 07-11-2024
Is UCMJ Authority Over Military Retirees Constitutional?
Terry
RE: Interesting question. - Rampy - 07-11-2024
What is driving this????
I’ve always been under the impression that under extremely limited circumstances military retirees receiving military retirement pay can be charged under the UCMJ if a crime occurred on a military installation
RE: Interesting question. - specops56 - 07-11-2024
(07-11-2024, 01:30 PM)Rampy Wrote: What is driving this????
I’ve always been under the impression that under extremely limited circumstances military retirees receiving military retirement pay can be charged under the UCMJ if a crime occurred on a military installation
Apparently, it doesn't matter where you commit the crime, DOD has jurisdiction. I never knew that either. I'm not retired so I never needed to look into it.
Terry
RE: Interesting question. - Rampy - 07-11-2024
(07-11-2024, 04:47 PM)specops56 Wrote:(07-11-2024, 01:30 PM)Rampy Wrote: What is driving this????
I’ve always been under the impression that under extremely limited circumstances military retirees receiving military retirement pay can be charged under the UCMJ if a crime occurred on a military installation
Apparently, it doesn't matter where you commit the crime, DOD has jurisdiction. I never knew that either. I'm not retired so I never needed to look into it.
Terry
Looks like in the past few years (3ish) the navy has gone after retirees vs civilian courts….and that there is a change of thought/understanding that if you receive retired pay that means you are receiving a retainer and subsequently fair game……